Monday, May 08, 2006

Trading Places

Peter Drucker published an article, Trading Places, in The National Interest shortly before he died. The article is well worth reading regardless of where one falls along the political spectrum.

From the introduction.

The New world economy is fundamentally different from that of the fifty years following World War II. The United States may well remain the political and military leader for decades to come. It is likely also to remain the world's richest and most productive national economy for a long time (though the European Union as a whole is both larger and more productive). But the U.S. economy is no longer the single dominant economy.

The emerging world economy is a pluralist one, with a substantial number of economic "blocs." Eventually there may be six or seven blocs, of which the U.S.-dominated NAFTA is likely to be only one, coexisting and competing with the European Union (EU), MERCOSUR in Latin America, ASEAN in the Far East, and nation-states that are blocs by themselves, China and India. These blocs are neither "free trade" nor "protectionist", but both at the same time.

Even more novel is that what is emerging is not one but four world economies: a world economy of information; of money; of multinationals (one no longer dominated by American enterprises); and a mercantilist world economy of goods, services and trade. These world economies overlap and interact with one another. But each is distinct with different members, a different scope, different values and different institutions. Let us examine each in turn.

3 Comments:

At 6:03 AM, Blogger beatroot said...

It's one thing to say that the US will remain the largest and most important world economy for decades to come (but it is only decades...China cometh) but it is another to say that the US will remain the hegemonic power...

As the US looses that position, it seems to rely more and more on coersive measures (which further weaken its hegenomy).

Not good.

 
At 8:08 AM, Blogger Lynn said...

beatroot,

I agree, especially about using coersive measures to bolster its hegemony. The U. S. is squandering its wealth and status at an alarming rate and with no end in sight.

 
At 4:39 PM, Blogger roman said...

Coersive measures worked well to ensure hegemony for 500 years of direct and another 500 years of indirect rule of the Roman Empire.
Lets not underestimate it.
Good piece by Drucker, BTW.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home