Sunday, November 20, 2005

Income Inequality

The Tax Policy Center always has good stuff to look at such as this short report on Income Taxes and Income Inequality Since 1979.
Following decades of relative stability, income inequality has risen sharply in the United States since the 1970s. Data from the Congressional Budget Office indicate that between 1979 and 2002, the share of pretax income accruing to households in the top quintile increased by almost 15 percent, from 45.5 percent to 51.5 percent. The increase was greatest for those with very high incomes: The top 1 percent earned 9.3 percent of pretax income in 1979, and 13.4 percent in 2002 — a 44 percent increase. Pretax income shares declined for each of the bottom four quintiles, with the decline sharpest among those making the least: The lowest quintile saw their pretax income share decrease from 5.8 percent to 4.2 percent, a reduction of more than 27 percent.

By design, progressive federal taxes offset some of the disparity in pretax incomes. Analysis of estate and income tax returns among the very wealthy indicate that progressive taxation played a significant role in the decline of income inequality during the mid-20th century (Kopczuk and Saez, 2004). At the end of the century, however, the distribution of after-tax incomes is growing more unequal too. In fact, the changes in after-tax income shares for the highest and lowest quintiles display not only the same trend as that for pretax shares, but the trends are of about the same magnitude.

2 Comments:

At 10:07 PM, Blogger Devang said...

There is something to be said for social mobility as well. And it's a tradeoff between income inequality and social mobility from something I read a while ago, from this country's history.

Social mobility, i.e. for me to get richer requires other things though, like a good education system to say the least.

 
At 11:50 PM, Blogger Lynn said...

devang,

If you look at the studies of social mobility, you find that it does not exist as advertised.

Those at the low end of the economic scale have almost no chance to achieve the so called good life: health care, decent housing, educational opportunity, a living wage that does not require all one's time at work, and the time to care for one's family.

Those in the middle class depend on their jobs as their major asset. Losing a good job can quickly send one towards poverty. Social mobility tends to be downward rather than upward. Otherwise, if you are in the middle class, you had better make plans that that is where you will reside for most of your life.

The Congressional Budget Office occasionally does studies on economic mobility. They tend to indicate the reality of social mobility does not match the myth.

I think the social mobility issue is another good example of introductory economics classes not teaching important issues.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home